Peters vs. Mercator Maps Am I Right?!

Today we had to compare two maps, the Peters Projection Map and the commonly used Mercator map. The Peters Projection Map is supposed to be more accurate in showing the globe on a flat surface. The reason is because the poles have no distortion compared to the Mercator map. This is called equal-area projection. Greenland is the most clear example, as Greenland seems to be quite large compared to how large it actually is. Another example is Africa, which really stretches out compared to how it looks on the Mercator map. Only few have adopted the Peters Projection Map however, and some want to see it more, while others want to see it gone. Either way, it seems the Peters Projection map should be the go to map because of it's accuracy.
Image result for peters projection map

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ancient Greek Theaters

A Few More Weeks of Cyber School

Alexander and his Horse